In the crossmodal '200 ms' condition, threshold values were not dependent on test modality or adapting modality per se (F2, 12 = 0.712, p>0.05), but the interaction between adapt and test modalities was significant (F4, 24 = 9.815, p = 0.0001).
The within-patient correlation of rCBF between modalities was significant for three patients (Table 3).
This quite large difference in normalized rCBF values between modalities was significant for six of ten patients.
The effect of modality was significant only for successive 2PD (F1,9 = 31.29, p < 0.0001), but not for simultaneous 2PD (F1,15 = 1.2, p = 0.289).
Therapeutic modalities were also significant predictors of survival for both genders.
There were significant shifts in the use of testing and treatment modalities.
The estimated s.d. were significant, which indicated stated preference heterogeneity among patients for PC treatment modality.
This difference between modalities was also significant.
The difference in prevalence between these two DSH assessment modalities is statistically significant, t(6) = 3.17, p <.03, indicating that the type of assessment tools used are contributing potential bias to estimates of self-injury within adolescent populations.
Because the difference in peritoneal damage and implantation between the two CO2 modalities is so significant in the mouse model, it is likely that this will only be exacerbated by the addition of mechanical trauma.
