Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(3)
The congruent realization of speech function takes place within clause through modal verbs such as can, may, could and might (implicit modal) or through modal adjuncts, e.g. possibly or probably (implicit mood adjunct).
I suggest the use of modal verbs such as "should/ought/might/may... do XYZ" p5 concerning the recommendations - should the recommendations give *examples* or should they be more categorical?
Take care not to write 'of' instead of 'have' after modal verbs such as would, could, should, must, may and might.
Similar(57)
Future reference is according to, e.g. Coates (1983) and Bybee et al. (1994) usually not available for modal auxiliary verbs such as English MUST in their epistemic reading, whereas it is the default reference with deontic modals.52 Additionally, the modal auxiliary verb and the modal adverb 必 bì apparently occupy different positions with regard to the VP.
I should have been more specific: Latin does not have modal auxiliary verbs such as English can, could, may, might, must, shall, should, will, would; the only auxiliary (but non-modal) verb in Latin is esse (to be) which is used to form the present perfect, future perfect and past perfect passive tenses of regular transitive verbs, and corresponding forms of deponent and semi-deponent verbs.
The epistemic adverbs of Han period Chinese differ semantically from epistemic modal auxiliary verbs such as 'might' in 'It might be true' in English.
That tiny modal verb with such a range of meanings!
English auxiliary verbs include the modal verbs, which may express such notions as possibility ("may," "might," "can," "could") or necessity ("must").
Some verbs, such as modal verbs like can and must, are followed by a bare infinitive.
Remember that some verbs, such as modal verbs, are followed by a bare infinitive.
Some verbs, such as modal verbs like can and must, are followed by a bare infinitive verb form.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com