Sentence examples for modal distinction between from inspiring English sources

It seems that Gregory did not go so far as to say that the past is necessary (beyond the normal necessity ex suppositione), but he does make some sort of modal distinction between the past and the future.

He argues that Hume's and Kant's criticisms of the ontological argument of St. Anselm are not directed at the strongest version of his argument found in Proslogion, chapter 3. Here, he thinks, there is a modal distinction implied between existing necessarily and existing contingently.

A modal distinction, according to Meyronnes, obtains between a thing and an intrinsic mode of that thing, where an intrinsic mode is something which "when added to a thing does not vary its formal definition … since it does not of itself imply any quiddity or formal definition" (In Sent. I, d. 42, q. 3 [(1520), 120vaL; 120vbO]; see too In Sent.

Between 'being' and the disjunctive transcendental properties, there is a modal distinction.[5] Scotus applies the theory of the 'intension and remission of forms' to the transcendentals (which introduces degrees of perfection in the transcendentals); hence, the common concept of 'being' and the proper concept of 'infinite being' are distinguished as a reality and its proper and intrinsic mode.

It may look as though this is just a terminological shift, but it is not so in at least the following way: a modal distinction is a lesser kind of distinction than a formal distinction.

That gives the equivalences $EpLp$ and $EpMp$, which effectively collapse modal distinctions.

Modal distinctions had previously been expressed by the interplay of aspectual and temporal marking alone.

The next section will outline the view of Parmenides' philosophical achievement that results from attending to his modal distinctions and to the epistemological distinctions he builds upon them.

And that is because, at the level of fundamental ontology, such modal distinctions simply have no place.

They have nonetheless failed to take proper account of the modal distinctions that define Parmenides' presentation of the ways of inquiry.

One reason why it is important to highlight the distinction between modal claims that are confused and modal claims that are not is that there are many modal claims that we might want to give a rigorous analysis but that Descartes would not.