Suggestions(1)
Exact(2)
In the first section we briefly looked at one argument, the so-called modal argument for the necessity of identities, for denying that there could be temporary identities.
Here is one version of that argument often referred to as the Modal Argument for the Necessity of Identities: Though widely accepted this type of argument can be contested.
Similar(58)
Give their implications for identity across time the modal argument and the argument against indeterminate identities are set out in more detail in the next section.
As far as the modal argument goes, these propositions can be identified with p, as, for every world w, they have exactly the same truth value at w as p intuitively has at w.
But their presence does show that the modal argument fails to bring out the real difficulties with descriptivism and the fundamental need for singular propositions.
Three arguments have been buttressed to dismantle the Russellian disdain for the peculiar intentionality of singular thoughts expressible by proper names: a modal argument, an epistemological argument and what can be called a "transcendental" argument.
The question then arises: how does one show that a modal premise of a modal argument is justified?
The second is a modal argument relying on the Necessity of Identity and a suitably strong modal logic.
The first argument in favor of singular propositions we shall examine is based on Saul Kripke's modal argument in (1970/1980).
An argument with a similar structure to the modal argument has been deployed to rule out indeterminate identities.
There are two main responses to the modal argument in the literature.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com