Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(7)
The separation employs a C18 column and a 51 9 40 (v/v/v) mixture of MeOH, 2-propanol and potassium phosphate solution (50 mM, pH 6.0), as mobile phase, delivered at 1.0 ml min−1; the analytes were detected and quantified at 220 nm.
Using this mobile phase delivered at a flow rate of 0.6 mL/min resulted in improved signals when compared with different ratios of same reagents.
The mobile phase (delivered at 0.30 mL/min) was methanol/H2O containing 0.1‰ formic acid with a gradient program as follows: from 0% B to 2% B in 0.01 min, hold for 1 min; from 2% B to 35% B in 0.01 min, hold for 3 min; from 35%Bto90%90% B in 11 min; back to 2% B in 0.01 min; maintain 4.99 min [15].
The mobile phase, delivered at 1 ml/min, consisted of a gradient mixture of water containing 0.1% formic acid (eluent A) and acetonitrile (eluent B).
Liquid chromatography in those days was undergoing a revolution that led to a dramatic increase in resolving power through the use of columns packed with small particles with the mobile phase delivered by high pressure pumps.
Chromatography was performed using a Gemini 5-μm C18 3.0 by 150 mm column with a 2 mM perfluorooctanoic acid-and-acetonitrile mixture as a mobile phase delivered at a flow rate of 0.5 ml/min.
Similar(53)
The LC mobile phases (delivered at 0.28 mL/min) included water containing 0.5 mM HCOOH for solvent A and methanol containing 0.5 mM HCOOH for solvent B. A specially designed LC binary gradient elution was performed and the gradient program was as fallows: 0 1 min at 0% B; from 0% B to 80% B in 0.01 min; from 80% B to 100% B in 2.5 min; back to 0% B in 0.01 min; maintained 2.5 min.
The mobile phase was delivered at a flow rate of 1.0 ml/min, the injection volume was 20 μl, the effluent was monitored at UV detection at 247 nm, and the retention time for exe was 5.0 min.
The mobile phase was delivered at a flow of 1.0 ml/min and at a maintained column temperature at 50°C, and quantification was achieved with reference to the external standards (Asikoglu et al. [2000]).
The mobile phase was delivered in gradient mode (0 min 25% B, 6 min 100% B, 8 min 100% B, solvent A being 0.1% aqueous formic acid with 10 mmol/L CH3COONH4, and solvent B being acetonitrile), with flow rate of 1 mL/min.
The mobile phase was delivered in gradient mode.
More suggestions(3)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com