Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(4)
This paper is based on our first year of work in our mobile learning research project in transforming primary three science lessons into a "mobilized" curriculum for a classroom context in which students routinely use mobile technologies.
This systematic review provides a current synthesis of mobile learning research across 2010 2015 in PK-12 education.
However, Pimmer et al.'s (2016) systematic review of empirical studies on mobile and ubiquitous learning shows that 20 years of mobile learning research has provided little systematic knowledge on the use of mobile technology in different educational designs and the associated educational effects in higher education settings.
Mobile learning research has provided evidence that it can enhance, extend and enrich the concept and activity of learning itself (Traxler 2011), as mobile devices can 'support every pedagogic option, including the didactic and the discursive, the individual and the social' (Traxler 2010).
Similar(56)
A review of the literature showed that, while self-efficacy has been much studied in mobile learning and MCL research, learners' self-regulation has not received equivalent research attention.
While self-efficacy has been much studied in mobile learning and MCL research, learners' self-regulation has not received equivalent research attention, as MCL studies that investigate self-regulation (e.g., El-Bishouty et al. (2010)) are relatively few in number.
Also we will find out new trends on mobile learning through this research.
Learning Analytics in Mobile Learning is a challenging research topic, due to the distinguishing features of mobile learning.
The research on mobile learning in science lacks in-depth investigation of the learning process.
In addition to the above-mentioned problems, research in mobile learning recommenders has its own challenges.
These are the issues encountered by research on mobile learning which locates more in informal learning contexts.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com