Sentence examples for mm there was from inspiring English sources
On reducing mesh size even up to 1 mm × 1 mm, there was no improvement in capturing homogeneous expansion.
For Ca2+ concentrations greater than 0.2 mM there was little effect on hexadecane solubility due to competing effects of calcium-induced rhamnolipid precipitation and enhanced hexadecane solubilization.
While significant aggregation of the Ala analogue was observed (2 10 mM), there was no evidence for aggregation in the Val analogue (1 3 mM).
The surface cracks formed in the oxide scale were arrested by further oxidation; for a thickness of 3.18 mm the failure mode was void nucleation, growth and coalescence, whereas for a thickness of 0.51 mm there was a mixed mode of ductile and cleavage-like fracture.
Based on measured parameters in present study was identified that at the salinity level of 60 mM, male seedlings had more resistance than female, but at the salinity level of 120 mM, there was not a significant difference between the male and female seedlings.
At even higher concentrations of HOCl (2.8 to 3.5 mM) there was a loss of Nrf2-target gene expression with increased expression of numerous heat shock and histone cluster genes, AP-1-family genes, cFos and Fra1 and DNA damage-inducible Gadd45 genes.
On the other hand, since the contrast was 0.39 (rate of decrease, 13%) when MTF was 100 cycles/mm, there was a smaller decrease (Fig. 1c).
Among very late presenters (CD4 <200 cells/mm), there was no difference in ART use in older or younger adults (73 and 74%, respectively, P = 0.24).
Additionally, subgroup analysis based on b-value found that when b = 500 s/mm, 600 s/mm, 800 s/mm, 500/1000 s/mm, there was significant difference between ADC values of normal renal tissue and malignant renal tumor tissue (P < 0.01), while at b = 1000 s/mm, no significant difference was observed (P > 0.05).
When b = 500 s/mm, 500/1000 s/mm, there was significant difference between ADC values of normal renal tissue and benign renal tumor tissue (P < 0.05), while at b = 600 s/mm, 800 s/mm, 1000 s/mm, no marked difference was detected (P > 0.05).
When considering records of viral load testing for only the ART-eligible category (CD4 ≤ 200 cells/mm), there was an absolute difference of 12.2% between arms in the proportion of patients who had a record of viral load test done, representing the largest difference across CD4 sub-groups (19 out of 39 or 33.3% intervention arm versus 16 out of 76 or 21.1% control arm).
