Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Fig. 4 Contrast to background variability ratios for the smallest (10 mm) sphere and 2 8 iterations, with different reconstruction settings for the Biograph mCT and mMR system.
Similar(59)
Local values have been determined experimentally of the coefficient of radial spread in trickle beds randomly packed by 2O mm spheres and 15 and 25 mm Raschig rings in dependence on local conditions of irrigation.
The transaxial slice corresponds to a plane intersecting the 20-mm sphere and the 40-mm shell insert.
Three different lesion designs were used within the phantom: a 20-mm sphere, a 40-mm sphere and a 40-mm hollow sphere with 25-mm solid inner sphere.
In pre-harmonized conditions, COVs were greater than 10% for all metrics in the 17-, 22-, and 28-mm spheres, SUVmax in the 13-mm sphere and SUVmean in the 37-mm sphere.
Figure 3 shows two PSF reconstructions from the GE Discovery 690 PET/CT where the higher spatial resolution on Fig. 3b (large matrix) leads to higher RCs, particularly for the 6-mm sphere, and exactly the same distinct features and non-monotonic relation between RC and sphere size as PSF images from the Siemens Biograph Truepoint TrueV PET/CT.
In addition, for the simulations, the mean of absolute differences between percentage bias of the 30-mm sphere and percentage bias of other sphere sizes (i.e. 20, 40 and 50 mm) was reported to assess the variation in bias across the different tumour sizes.
The ratios of packed bed diameter to packing diameter for 9.5 mm and 5 mm sphere packing were ∼9.5 and 18 respectively, with the average packed bed porosities around 0.4.
For each subject, an 8 mm sphere was drawn around this ROI and eigenvectors extracted using the VOI toolkit for SPM2.
A 12 mm sphere was chosen to include both sub peaks (SMA and M1) of the motor cluster (see Table 1).
The sensor board and rechargeable battery were cast into a one inch (25.4 mm) sphere using silicone rubber.
More suggestions(2)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com