Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(25)
This process was assessed by shearing 10 mm root sections ("roots") in a 24 mL ultra-scale down shearing device, including an impeller with serrated blade edges, intended to mimic the action of a large-scale homogenizer.
Less marked but similar changes were observed in 3 mm root apices.
We also show that femoral cortex geometry can be predicted from anthropological data combined with femoral measurements with less than 2.3 mm root mean square error, and cortical thickness with less than 0.5 mm root mean square error.
The bead was taped 1 cm from the tips of the fingers, and the position of this bead was tracked optically in the infrared (60 Hz, 0.35 mm root mean square accuracy; Polaris system; Northern Digital).
The default root architecture of three-year-old S. tuberosa and the relation between soil physical parameters and fine root dry matter (≤2 mm), root length density, root tuber volume, root tuber fresh weight, and shoot-root ratio were analyzed.
The average difference was 0.85% (mean relative error) and 33.80 mm (root mean square error) between the EC measurements and field water balance method calculations, and 7.72% and 47.08 mm between LAS measurements and MOD16 ET from 2008 to 2010 at the three sites.
Similar(35)
The root systems of narrow-leafed lupin plants were dominated by a short and thickened taproot (10 26 cm depth, 7 14 mm root-collar diameter) and horizontally distributed primary lateral roots when compared to previous observations of the same genotypes under non-compacted soil conditions.
Irrespective of tree species, both C N and C P ratios followed a trend of 0 2 mm roots < 2 5 mm roots < 5 10 mm roots during the experimental period.
We focused on very fine (<0.2 mm) and fine (0.2 1 mm) roots.
Both 2 5 mm and 5 10 mm roots tended to release more N than fine roots after 2-year incubation.
The roots of B. albosinensis decayed faster compared to those of two conifer trees (A. faxoniana and P. asperata) in the 2 5 mm and 5 10 mm roots.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com