Sentence examples for mm hardness from inspiring English sources

The specifications of G-340 were described as follows: particle size: 8 × 30 mesh; mean particle diameter: 0.9 1.1 mm; hardness: >93%; bulk density: 0.46 0.50 g cm−3; total surface area: >950 m2 g−1.

Table 1 Basic physical parameters of rock specimens Rock type Diameter (mm) Height (mm) Hardness Lithologic characteristics Siltstone 48.64 97.84 5.0 Dark grey argillaceous cementation; bedding; including ball, flake pyrite N-limestone 49 95.4 8.0 Grey; impurity; non-stable thickness Limestone 48.44 96.4 8.0 Grey; impurity; fracture; calcite filling.

This method is an easy and effective technique in producing a hard layer with a thickness of about 2 4 mm and hardness between 700 and 950 HV.

When the sample-screen separation was increased from 12 to 70 mm the hardness response improved.

Interestingly, at the larger tablet diameter of 15 mm, while hardness increased and porosity decreased with an increase in CF, the DT was resistant to change.

When SOD increases from 150 to 175 mm, the hardness increases to 165 HV0.1 and shows no significant alteration.

By more increment of SOD to 200 and 225 mm, the hardness of the coatings drops from 164 to 159 and 144 HV0.1, respectively.

A flat silicone gasket (thickness 1.5875 mm, durometer hardness A40) was laid on top of the open ends of the wells with a thin stainless steel sheet (0.1016 mm) then placed on top of the gasket.

An almost uniform alloyed layer free of cracks and porosities having a thickness of 0.8 1.0 mm and a hardness of 850 900 HV was achieved.

When the scan speed was reduced from 15to1010 mm s−1, coating hardness increased from 882 ± 67 to 1049 ± 112 Hv due to an increase in the volume fraction of TCP in the coating.

At 380 mm substrate position, hardness, Young's modulus and fracture toughness were found to be the lowest compared to that of the coatings produced at 340 and 420 mm substrate positions.