Sentence examples for mm footprint from inspiring English sources

The 4350 × 3250 mm footprint of the test bridge represents a 1 2.75 scale of a 12.5 m span full scale bridge.

An electronic chip with a 2.45 × 2.45 mm footprint having a hot spot of 0.5 × 0.5 mm at its centre was used for simulations.

This is the first demonstration and characterization of continuous flow thermal reactors within the 8 mm × 8 mm footprint of a 96-well micro-titer-plate and is the smallest continuous flow PCR to date.

Arrays of continuous flow thermal reactors were designed, configured, and fabricated in a 96-device (12 × 8) titer-plate format with overall dimensions of 120 mm × 96 mm, with each reactor confined to a 8 mm × 8 mm footprint.

Rechargeable 3D microbatteries prepared on a 3 mm × 3 mm footprint have an areal capacity of nearly 2 mAh cm−2, operate at current densities up to 0.66 mA cm−2, and withstand 100 cycles.

However, in cases with poor visibility due to obesity, a 9L-D linear transducer (2.4 10.0 MHz, 14 × 53 mm footprint, FOV 45 mm, and DOF 12 cm) or a C1-5 convex transducer (1.6 6.0 MHz, 17 × 75 mm footprint, FOV 65 degrees, and DOF 35 cm) was used.

The home-made MEMS mirror (aperture size: 1 × 1 mm and footprint size: 2 × 2 mm) has four electrothermal bimorph-based actuators made from a lateral-shift-free large-vertical-displacement (LSF-LVD) design [ 18, 19].

The contact area of double-row and suture bridge fixation in fresh-frozen human shoulders has been tested previously [ 2]. Results showed that the mean pressurized contact area between the tendon and insertion was significantly greater for the 4-suture bridge technique (124.2 +/− 16.3 mm, 77.6 % footprint) than the double-row technique (63.3 +/− 28.5 mm, 39.6 % footprint).

Aguirre et al. have demonstrated an electrostatic gimbaled 2D MEMS mirror with angular vertical comb drives [27], which offers the mirror rotation angle of ±6° at over 100 V (Fig. 3a) The scanning mirror has a circular aperture with a diameter of 1 mm within the footprint size of 3 mm × 3 mm.

If one were to consider the entire horizontal cross-section of the device, the according area would double to 0.06 mm, and the footprint of the device was at present around 60 mm including the access ports for fluid injection.

With the elimination of moving parts, the proposed device is able to overcome the mechanical limitations of present scanning devices, such as fatigue and low operating frequency, while maintaining a small system footprint (∼0.5 mm × 0.5 mm).