Sentence examples for mm criterion from inspiring English sources

The 10 mm criterion is the most widely used that considers all reactions ≥10 mm to be a marker of infection [20], [22].

The 3D gamma evaluation showed that the dose agreement was up to 98.7% for the 2%/1 mm criterion and reached 99.9% for the 2%/2 mm criterion.

3D gamma evaluation showed that 98.1% and 98.5% of the voxels passed the 3%/3 mm criterion for the prostate case and the head and neck case, respectively.

For the gamma analysis using EBT films, the passing rate of the 3%/3 mm criterion met the recommendation (should be >90%) set by TG 119 for the studies performed in the nasopharyngeal region and the lung, where heterogeneities exist.

However, the one performed using the RPC head and neck phantom, where only tissue equivalent material was involved, could only produce a passing rate of 88% for the 5%/3 mm criterion [ 33].

All definitions utilizing a 2 mm criterion were inversely related to bacterial burden, for example having a high percent of sites with PD = 2 mm was suggestive of low bacterial burden (r = -0.55), whereas having a high percent of sites with PD = 3 mm was suggestive of high bacterial burden (r = 0.54).

Dose distributions in the presence of setup errors were evaluated, according to the γ passing rate with the 3% and 2 mm criteria (γ3%/2 mm) and dose volumetric indices (D90 for the target volume and D2 for the spinal cord), using the Delta4 device (ScandiDos).

The results showed that although the gamma pass rate at the (3%, 3 mm) criteria did not effectively reflect a setup deviation of less than 3 mm, the gamma pass rate at the (2%, 2 mm) criteria showed higher effectiveness in detecting a dose distribution error caused by a setup deviation over 2 mm.

The comparison of these two calculation methods showed that the average gamma pass rate for 10 hybrid phantom plans at the 3%—3 mm and 2%—2 mm criteria was better than 99.48% and 97.60%, respectively.

Even when the (2%, 2 mm) criteria were used, the average pass rates remained higher than 97%. Figure 2 compared the dose distribution in CBCT- and FBCT-based plans on the transversal plane of three randomly selected patients.

The gamma comparison between CBCT- and FBCT-based dose computations showed that the pass rates of (2%, 2 mm) criteria were better than 97.60 ± 0.83% and 97.74 ± 2.08% in the phantom and 10 NPC cases.