Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(11)
After the extubation of the trachea, she had no pain at rest and on coughing (visual analogue scale of 0.0 and 0.0 mm, at rest and on coughing, respectively).
Lactate was approximately 1.0 mM at rest and rose slightly to approximately 1.7 mM at 15 min in all trials then declined to approximately 1.5 mM by 30 minutes and remained at that level for the remainder of the 63% exercise task (Figure 4).
Pi concentration increased from 5.9 ± 1.8 mM at rest to 29.3 ± 4.6 mM at exhaustion.
Postoperative rescue analgesia consisted of oral morphine (10 mg); it was administered if VAS > 50 mm at rest.
Absolute concentrations of the metabolites were calculated after correction for partial saturation and assuming that the ATP concentration ([ATP]) is 8.2 mM at rest (Taylor et al. 1986).
Based on a previous study [ 13], we assumed a change in brachial artery diameter before and after forearm ischemia of 17.8 ± 10.9% (4.0 ± 0.6 mm at rest vs. 4.7 ± 0.6 mm at 60 sec).
Similar(49)
PAH was defined as a mean pulmonary artery pressure >25 mm Hg at rest or >30 mm Hg with exercise, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure or left ventricular end-diastolic pressure ≤18 mm Hg, and pulmonary vascular resistance ≥240 dyn·sec·cm– 5.
Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a major type of PH that is defined by a mean pulmonary arterial pressure higher than 25 mm Hg at rest or 30 mm Hg during exercise (Kovacs et al., 2009).
Mean systolic aortic pressure was 127 mm Hg at rest and 165 mm Hg during stress (P < 0.05).
Pulmonary hypertension is defined as a mean PAP equal to or greater than 25 mm Hg at rest or 30 mm Hg on exercise, a definition which applies to all but the youngest infants.
Isolated pulmonary hypertension was defined as clinical evidence of right-heart failure and/or increased mean pulmonary arterial pressure (PAPm>25 mm Hg at rest or PAP>30 mm Hg during exercise), determined by right-heart catheterisation.
More suggestions(1)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com