ML, in contrast, remained unbiased in all these analyses.
However, commercially available collection kits generally require study subjects to provide only a small volume of saliva (between 1 and 2 mL), in contrast to many studies using blood sampling where perhaps 6 10 mL of blood is collected [ 4, 5].
These data indicate that ML 3000, in contrast to omeprazole, does not require acidification for induction of inhibitory activity.
Presenting the single ML tree, in contrast, foregrounds the "all SNPs are errors" solution even though more resolved trees would have only slightly lower likelihood.
In the nt123 ML tree, in contrast, all taxa but Bucculatrix move to parts of the tree that are generally well supported and expected based on morphology and existing classifications (e.g. [ 11, 35, 82], Eumetriochroa with Phyllocnistis, and Atteva with Eucalantica).
In contrast, ML was not biased on finite data, and the asymptotically unbiased nature of ML is already well established [9], [15] [17].
Feed gas (5% CO, 10% O2 in He) was passed through the catalytic bed at a total flow rate of 50 ml · min-1 (in contrast with most literature studies that use 1% CO or less [1 4, 31]).
A key difference between BI and ML and a major proposed advantage of BI [3], [10] [12] is that Bayesian methods incorporate uncertainty about "nuisance parameters" such as branch lengths on the topology and the parameters of the evolutionary model; in contrast, ML requires specific values for these parameters to be estimated from the data.
In contrast, ML analysis of nucleotide data shows Cyanopt.
In contrast, ML can perform better than parsimony by gathering additional support for the correct quartet topology from partially-informative non-AABB patterns, which are not tracked by our theory.
In contrast, ML methods are usually computationally intensive, but more importantly require either an estimation of the rate of evolutionary change or force one to assume that the rate of change is constant.
