Suggestions(1)
Exact(1)
When the mixture was contrasted with the sum of its single components (CO2PEA−{CO2+PEA}), activations in integration centers (left superior temporal and right intraparietal sulcus) and in orbitofrontal areas (left medial and lateral orbitofrontal cortex) were detected.
Similar(58)
Finally, the results obtained with the model mixture are contrasted with those obtained using a real hydrotreated FCC gasoline with less than 1.0 wt.% olefins.
After rinsing three times with water the immunostained cryosections were contrasted with mixture of uranyl acetate and methyl cellulose (25 centipoises, Sigma M-6385) in water, at final concentration of 1.3% each, for 10 min at RT. Excess of the liquid was removed and the sections were dried at RT.
After rinsing three times with water, the immunostained cryosections were contrasted with a mixture of uranyl acetate and methyl cellulose (25 centipoises, Sigma M-6385) in water, at a final concentration of 1.3% each, for 10 min at RT. Excess liquid was removed and the sections were dried at RT.
After rinsing three times with water, the immunostained cryosections were contrasted with a mixture of uranyl acetate and methyl cellulose (25 centipoises, Sigma M-6385) in water, at a final concentration of 1.3% each, for 10 min. Excess liquid was removed and the sections were dried at RT.
There is contrasting evidence.
Then the mixture was examined immediately under a phase-contrast microscope.
In contrast, a heterogeneous mixture was found in FDNY-FF IS, consistent with exposures to aerosolized building debris and dust and smoke generated by the collapse and fires (Lioy et al. 2002).
The cultivars composing a mixture are often chosen for their contrasted disease resistance levels, whereas their architecture is rarely taken into account.
The estimated amount of instilled contrast mixture is recorded in the radiology report.
In contrast, the mixture is in a single phase if both tests arrive at a trivial solution, both tests produce (S le 1), or one of the tests yields trivial solution and the other one gives (S le 1).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com