"mixing equipment" is a grammatically correct and commonly used phrase in written English.
It refers to any tools or machinery used for mixing ingredients together, typically in a production or industrial setting. This phrase can be used in a variety of contexts, such as when discussing the manufacturing process of a product or describing the equipment used in a chemistry lab experiment. Example: The bakery invested in new mixing equipment to increase production efficiency and improve the quality of their bread.
Ms. Cherico, who still works as an occupational therapist, had a strategy of slow growth, investing about $14,000 in mixing equipment and allowing sales to rise gradually so that she and her husband, Steve, would not have to take out a loan.
The agreement calls for the destruction of chemical agent mixing equipment by November and, perhaps most ambitious, for Syria to completely rid itself of chemical weapons and production facilities in less than a year, a timetable that would set a speed record and one that many experts doubt could be completed even with Syria's full cooperation.
This is due to the differences in the mixing equipment, and to the procedures following.
On Sunday, members of the joint OPCW-UN mission observed Syrian staff using cutting torches and angle-grinders to destroy missile warheads, aerial bombs, and mixing equipment.
Hence, a better understanding of the parameters that control the dispersion process can lead to advances in processing techniques and the design of efficient mixing equipment.
The analysis contributes to the modelling of gas-liquid phase mixing equipment such as stirred-tank reactors, fermentors, bubble aerators etc.
This chapter provides information about mixing equipments.
The air used to generate aphrons is usually incorporated into the fluid with conventional fluid-mixing equipment at ambient pressure, thereby reducing costs and safety concerns associated with conventional air and foam drilling operations.
The model will be designed to quantify the effect of working procedures, minimum storage time of the mixes, equipment extensions and modifications.
The most plausible explanations are differences in study populations (e.g., patients' age, body mass index or tumour mix), equipment and examiners' use of the IOTA terms.
Accordingly, the 48-hour exposure tests under flow-through conditions with online chemical-mix equipment were performed for 6 concentrations (0.1 TU, 1 TU, 2 TU, 5 TU, 10 TU, and 20 TU) and repeated three times for each 48-hour exposure to compare with the control.
