"mixed methods studies" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It can be used when discussing research designs and approaches that encompass both quantitative and qualitative methods. For example, "This research project utilizes mixed methods studies to generate a comprehensive understanding of the problem."
These reviews include qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies.
Many other examples exist; Creswell and colleagues describe 5 additional mixed methods studies in primary care as well as provide criteria for evaluating mixed methods studies [ 2].
A documentary analysis of the proposals, reports and publications from mixed methods studies in HSR was undertaken to explore how mixed methods studies were undertaken.
This indicates that any unique insights available from mixed methods studies may not be disseminated in ways that are attributable to mixed methods studies.
Mixed methods studies are the context of most LQR studies in healthcare [ 5].
There are also many different ways of designing mixed methods studies.
As the number of mixed methods studies increases, their inclusion in systematic reviews is more likely.
Hence, the results of this qualitative study will enable the development of theories and the framing of hypotheses in future quantitative or mixed-methods studies.
We will extend our search to also include qualitative and mixed-methods studies as these may potentially include relevant data for programme theory development.
This quality appraisal tool seems appropriate as it was designed to appraise complex literature reviews consisting of qualitative, quantitative and mixed-methods studies.
We focused on QII studies that, as described previously, 21 addressed effectiveness, impacts, or success; qualitative, quantitative and mixed-methods studies were all considered eligible.
