Sentence examples for mixed analyses of from inspiring English sources

Minimum sample sizes of 34 and 24 are needed for adequate power (≥.80) to detect medium-sized effects in mixed analyses of variance with two groups and two (i.e., time 1 vs. 2, to evaluate the immediate impact of the intervention) or four assessments (i.e., times 2 – 5, to capture learning effects over time).

Significant interactions between health text, photo and smoking status were followed-up by mixed analyses of variance (ANOVA) for each level of photo.

The lower total RTOP scores of CF resulted from significantly lower scores for all subscales except propositional knowledge, compared with FIRST IV PDs (Table 3; mixed analyses of variance, p < 0.0001).

The 2 (Mood State) × 3 (Depressive Symptoms) × 4 (Facial Expression) mixed analyses of variance (ANOVA) for repeated measure of the AAT effect scores, with the first two factors varying between participants, yielded a main effect of Facial Expression, F 3,298) = 7.20, P < .001, f = 0.15.

RTs for correctly performed prime selections and error rates on prime events were analyzed using 2 × 2 × 3 mixed analyses of variance (ANOVA) with group (PD vs. control) as the between subject factor, and medication session (OFF vs. ON) and numerical distance (one vs. two vs. three) as within-subject variables.

A timely decision on indication of the arrival of the needle tip would be made as long as a conclusion was given by mixed analyses among the three types of discriminant methods with cross-validation: (1) p (k   ∣   x ) = Pr ⁡ { C = k   ∣   X = x } = π k p k (x ) ∑ l = 1 K π l p l (x ).

Metamorphic mass, larval period and growth rate were log-transformed to homogenize variances and analyzed with mixed model analyses of (co) variance using the MIXED procedure [ 47].

Mixed factorial analyses of covariance, with order controlled, analyzed gram and energy snack intake across conditions.

A series of mixed design analyses of variance (ANOVA) were computed to examine group therapy effectiveness and outcomes related to PM and symptom severity.

Separate mixed model analyses of variance were conducted for pleasure and arousal, with test order as the between-subject factor, and time and task as within-subject factors.

Both 1-way repeated measures and 2-way mixedesigngn analyses of variance were used to determine differences between the knee conditions, with significance set at P <.05.