Sentence examples for mitigation outcome from inspiring English sources

"Article 6 conceptualized the Internationally Transferred Mitigation Outcome (ITMO) which is the Paris Agreement unit of exchange.

In this case, the unit might be more like an IMO (international mitigation outcome) - a verified result that simply isn't transferred.

The Agreement supports the establishment of new cooperative approaches including internationally transferred mitigation outcomes, through which individual countries can meet their nationally determined contributions.

Assessing the mitigation outcomes in the forest sector is more complex than in other GHG sectors (e.g., energy, agriculture).

The approach that we propose is based on the principle that the accounting of forest mitigation outcomes should reflect fully the impact of changes in forest management practice relative to a historical reference period.

Targets are typically expressed relative to the emissions in a base year (or baseline), thus the accounted mitigation outcomes should reflect genuine deviations from the activities generating emissions in the base year (or baseline).

Based on the lessons learnt under the Kyoto Protocol, and building on a previous methodological report [30], we propose our approach for a more credible accounting of the forest sink mitigation outcomes and illustrate a possible method to implement it.

Despite several efforts to develop widely acceptable accounting rules, assessing the mitigation outcomes in extant forests has always been a controversial topic during climate negotiations, affecting adversely the credibility of the forest sink mitigation and its comparability with other GHG sectors [13 16].

The conceptual framework that we propose for accounting mitigation from forest management is based on the principle that the accounting of mitigation outcomes should reflect fully the impact of changes in forest management practice (policy- or market-driven) relative to a historical reference period.

The credibility and effectiveness of country climate targets under the Paris Agreement requires that, in all greenhouse gas (GHG) sectors, the accounted mitigation outcomes reflect genuine deviations from the type and magnitude of activities generating emissions in the base year or baseline.

Our approach is based on the principle that the accounting of mitigation outcomes should reflect fully the impact of changes in forest management practice (policy- or market-driven) relative to a historical reference period, similarly to the way GHG emissions are treated in other sectors.