Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(5)
Writing in an online journal, Boyd argued that if scientists speak freely, they create conflict between themselves and policymakers, leading to a "chronically deep-seated mistrust of scientists that can undermine the delicate foundation upon which science builds relevance".
The network has also helped to address the public mistrust of scientists and authorities following the 1999 evacuation, as described by a vigía from Baños: "Initially, the relationship between the OVT and the town was bad, for sure, by certain leaders, a gap was formed.
With others, this may simply deepen their mistrust of scientists and science.
Dunlap, McCright and Gifford all said mistrust of scientists is a growing issue -- and for people who don't trust scientists, scientific evidence clearly doesn't carry much weight.
Both these factors play off one another to create conflict between scientists and policy-makers and, in the worst cases, can lead to a breakdown of the relationship and chronically deep-seated mistrust of scientists that can undermine the delicate foundation upon which science builds relevance within the policy-making environment.
Similar(55)
You write about the mutual mistrust of academic scientists and privately employed scientists.
A breakdown in direct communication of science to the public can lead to widespread mistrust and a misunderstanding of scientists and their research.
There seem to be widespread misperceptions or mistrust among scientists about the policies of those responsible for the assessment of research.
The tome in question is Charles Darwin's The Origin of Species - a publishing phenomenon that not only continues to evoke the awe of scientists but also to provoke public misunderstanding and mistrust 140 years after its first appearance.
We hypothesized that trust in science may be strongly related to understanding the nature of science, and that misunderstanding how science works may lead to mistrust in science and scientists that is manifested in rejection of the work of scientists such as the explanations for biological evolution.
The stories of scientists create new scientists.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com