mist-covered

USAGE SUMMARY

"mist-covered" is correct and usable in written English. You can use it to describe something that is obscured or shrouded by mist. An example is: "The mist-covered mountains loomed in the distance." Alternative expressions include "fog-shrouded" and "mist-cloaked."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

22 human-written examples

But stretches of green, mist-covered mountain slopes do remain.

The New York Times - Travel

Gradually, the mist-covered mountains gave way to a gently rolling grassy plain where horses and cattle grazed.

The New York Times - Travel

AN illuminated tower soars above the clear Black Sea and the mist-covered Caucasus mountains surrounding the port town of Batumi, Georgia.

The New York Times - Travel

Shadowy figures emerge from mist-covered paths, lending an air of mystery to Jorge Uzon's images of remote towns in Chile's Patagonia region.

The New York Times

"The new blacktop highways, reaching all the way from the mist-covered hills to the wire grass and lowlands to the south, signaled the region's future.

The New York Times - Books

I'm driving across the Ponte Legnano towards Mantua: the long bridge slices through two mist-covered lakes that form a gigantic moat protecting this majestic city.

The Guardian - Travel

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

38 human-written examples

A mist covered everything and, with the sunshine, was beginning to grow sharp and strange.

The New York Times

Nature loomed large on the journey: mist covered the tops of the mountains; the fields were scattered with buttercups.

Independent

A light mist covered the hilly roads by Alfredo De Los Santos's neighborhood in Hopewell Junction, N.Y., last week.

The New York Times - Sports

IT had been raining all day, so mist covered the trees and shrubs as we set out for a walk through Duncan and Julia Brine's six-acre garden, a dreamlike landscape that takes its cues from the old shade trees and fence posts remaining from the farm that was once here, as well as the native plants, like black locust and joe-pye weed, that populate the hills and spring-fed marsh.

The New York Times

A mist covers Damon's eyes.

The Guardian - Music

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use this phrase to create atmospheric or evocative imagery in travel writing, fiction or descriptive journalism.

Common error

Avoid using "mist-covered" in immediate proximity to other words that mean the same thing, such as "the mist-covered mountains were covered in fog". This creates a tautology that weakens the impact of your description.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "mist-covered" functions as a compound adjective. It is formed by combining a noun ("mist") and a past participle ("covered"). According to Ludwig, this structure is used to modify nouns by describing a state of being enveloped by a specific substance. In many of the provided examples, it serves to set a specific atmospheric tone.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

75%

Travel & Geography

15%

Science & Research

10%

Less common in

Legal Documents

2%

Technical Manuals

3%

Social Media

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "mist-covered" is a widely accepted and highly effective compound adjective. Ludwig shows that it is particularly common in News & Media and descriptive writing to add a layer of atmospheric depth to landscapes like mountains, valleys and rivers. With a high frequency of occurrence in authoritative sources, it is a reliable choice for writers looking to move beyond simple adjectives like "misty". The phrase follows standard hyphenation rules for compound modifiers and is almost exclusively used in a positive or neutral descriptive sense. Whether describing the mist-covered Caucasus mountains or a mist-covered river, it remains a staple of high-quality English prose.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

fog-shrouded

Suggests a thicker, more opaque level of obscurity than mist.

mist-cloaked

Adds a more poetic and mysterious connotation to the description.

shrouded in mist

A prepositional phrase version that places more emphasis on the act of being hidden.

veiled in fog

Implies a delicate, semi-transparent covering.

cloud-covered

Refers specifically to higher-altitude meteorological conditions.

enveloped in mist

Suggests being completely surrounded or swallowed by the atmosphere.

hazy

A single-word alternative that is less specific about the source of the obscurity.

misty

A simpler adjective that describes the general state rather than a 'covering'.

covered with mist

A literal, non-hyphenated phrasing often used as a predicate adjective.

foggy

Common and straightforward, but lacks the descriptive depth of the query.

FAQs

How do I use "mist-covered" in a sentence?

You can use it as a compound adjective to describe landscapes, such as in the sentence "The <a href="/s/mist-covered+valley" target="_blank" rel="alternative">mist-covered valley looked serene at dawn".

What can I say instead of "mist-covered"?

Depending on the desired tone, you could use "<a href="/s/fog-shrouded" target="_blank" rel="alternative">fog-shrouded", "<a href="/s/mist-cloaked" target="_blank" rel="alternative">mist-cloaked" or simply "<a href="/s/misty" target="_blank" rel="alternative">misty".

Should "mist-covered" always be hyphenated?

Yes, when it appears before a noun (an attributive adjective). However, if you say "The hills were <a href="/s/covered+in+mist" target="_blank" rel="alternative">covered in mist", the hyphen is usually omitted.

What is the difference between "mist-covered" and "fog-shrouded"?

While similar, "<a href="/s/fog-shrouded" target="_blank" rel="alternative">fog-shrouded" implies a thicker, denser vapor that reduces visibility more significantly than "mist-covered".