Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(8)
Missing smoking information was, however, more frequent (14%).
Thus, it is unlikely that our results were severely confounded due to missing smoking information.
Since this resulted in a high percentage of missing smoking information we did not include smoking in the multivariate analyses.
However, 25 additional subjects were excluded because of missing smoking information and 37 because of insufficient asbestos exposure data.
The selection of 1998 2000 data for these exposure-outcome analyses was due to missing smoking information at baseline for RHINE and I-ECRHS.
100 records had missing information on pregnancy planning, and 816 records had missing smoking information, leaving a total of 18,178 records with planning information and 17,462 records with smoking information.
Similar(52)
Similarly, women missing smoking data during any pregnancy time period did not differ from women missing such data during other pregnancy time periods, nor from women with complete information on smoking.
Thirteen subjects were excluded from the study because of missing smoking status information and the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) score.
A substantial proportion (29%) of mothers excluded from the analyses had missing prenatal smoking information, which may, in part, account for the apparent increased smoking among included participants.
The analysis was repeated excluding those with missing maternal smoking information and the results were not notably altered (data not shown).
Ironically, I still miss smoking.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com