Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(11)
This included 470 adults due to missing serum creatinine and 225 children due to missing height (n = 173), serum creatinine (n = 34), or both (n = 18), although these patients were still included in the analyses of dialysis incidence.
15 patients with missing serum creatinine values were excluded from this analysis.
Please note, 15 patients with missing serum creatinine values were excluded from this analysis.
Estimated creatinine clearance could not be calculated for 19 subjects due to missing serum creatinine or weight measurements, and eGFR could not be calculated for 6 subjects due to missing serum creatinine values or race/ethnicity.
Cystatin C concentrations were measured in a subsample of the NHANES 1999 2002 participants aged 12 years and older who were not missing serum creatinine (18).
For the purposes of the present study, we excluded participants with estimated GFR > 60 mL/min/1.73 m or those missing serum creatinine information.
Similar(49)
The patients for whom data were missing, including serum creatinine, urine output, or dipstick test results, were also excluded (n = 250).
Less than 2% of patients are expected to have a missing peak serum creatinine value within 14 days of surgery, and in such cases in the absence of receipt of acute dialysis, we will carry forward the prerandomisation serum creatinine value for all analyses (which means the patient will not have developed AKI; see Analysis section).
Less than 10% of patients are expected to have a missing peak serum creatinine value during the hospital stay, and in such cases, in the absence of receipt of acute dialysis, we will carry forward the prerandomisation serum creatinine value for all analyses (which means the patient will not have developed AKI; see analysis section).
The largest contributor to missing data was serum creatinine.
Of the 4308 participants, the 527 subjects with missing values for serum creatinine, urinary creatinine or serum albumin were excluded.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com