Ai Feedback
Exact(4)
These models were first fitted by excluding women with missing receptor status or missing data on other variables on a casewise basis.
A formal assessment of missing receptor status, and racial comparisons between black, white, colored, and Asian South African women were also performed.
Women who developed the competing breast cancer subtype or were missing receptor status were also censored at the time of occurrence [ 27].
Missing receptor status and tumor grade tended to occur in the same women (see Additional file 1, Table S1).
Similar(56)
For 66 cases in NHS or NHSII with missing receptor data on pathology reports, receptor status was obtained from immunohistochemical staining performed on paraffin sections of the tumor tissue microarray according to a standard protocol [ 44].
GCR cases missing hormone receptor status were on average one year older, although there was no significant difference between those missing and not missing hormone receptor status by the three age categories.
However, when the models were rerun with those cases missing hormone receptor status (i.e., excluding hormone receptor status as a covariate), the results were similar to those presented in Table 2, indicating excluding those missing hormone receptor status did not have a strong effect on the overall model estimates.
Data for cases with missing hormone receptor status suppressed from table.
We conducted a sensitivity analysis in order to aid in determining what effect, if any, GCR cases missing hormone receptor status had on the results.
GCR cases missing hormone receptor status were also more likely to be diagnosed with duct and lobular type, mammary Paget disease, sarcomas, and "other" histologies, although as sarcomas are not amenable to hormonal treatment, it makes sense cases with these cancers may not necessarily be tested for hormone receptors.
Records with missing histological grade and receptor status were not excluded.
Related(1)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com