Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
The post-study questionnaire was completed by 75%% (45/60) of HSAs, with the majority of missing questionnaires being from the Kasinthula catchment area (47 % [8/17] missing).
Similar(59)
Patients with complete and missing data (i.e. missing questionnaires) were compared to examine whether the assumption of data missing in a non-random way could be rejected.
The study was announced on the university hospital intranet, a platform accessible to all employees, and a reminder to send back missing questionnaires was placed one month after the study start.
Scores for missing questionnaires were imputed as the treatment group mean.
The incidence of SCD was calculated based on these questionnaires, but no information about missing questionnaires is provided.
However, where more than half of the values needed were missing, questionnaires were excluded from the analysis.
To ensure return of all completed follow-up questionnaires, all hospitals with at least three missing questionnaires were personally visited by a medical student.
The patients with missing questionnaires were equally distributed among the three postoperative pain categories: five with mild, five with moderate, and five with severe postoperative pain.
It is possible that among the missing questionnaires were many couples who had separated, which could explain some results, such as those observed regarding the relationships in which women adjusted poorly compared to the men.
Six hundred and seventeen women among the 629 included had a questionnaire filled at enrolment (missing questionnaires were mostly related to women whose pregnancy ended with a stillbirth); 32.6% (201/617) of the women were enrolled in the health centre of Tori Avamè, 48.1% (297/617) in Tori Cada and 19.3% (119/617) in Tori Gare.
This notion is supported by our finding that participants with fewer missed questionnaires were more likely to be working, and therefore to have access to email reminders.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com