Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThis phrase is grammatically correct and can be used in written English.
It is commonly used to describe a period of time in which something or someone was missing or absent. Here are a few examples: - "The dog was missing for two hours before we finally found him in the neighbor's yard." - "I thought I had lost my phone, but it was just missing for two hours before I realized I left it in the car." - "The hiker was reported missing for two hours before the search and rescue team found her stranded on the mountain."
Exact(3)
There was one horrible occasion where he was missing for two hours in the studio.
If a DJ goes missing for two hours, it is not a cause for concern.
The guy had been missing for two hours and blogs around the world were drumming up panic as if Beelzebub himself had just dropped a festival trvp mixtape from hell.
Similar(57)
"Were they missing for three hours, or five hours?" she asked.
Someone is missing for six hours and then suddenly he turns up, or you spend two hours climbing a mountain to reach someone stranded there and then a helicopter picks him up, under your nose".
This time, no one noticed her missing for seven hours.
In 24 hour urine, urinary calcium was missing for two samples, and results were excluded for three samples as the sample time was too short (≤15 hours).
This means the Roomba knows which spots it missed and will work tirelessly for two hours, recharge, and then head back into the fray until it is done.
Indigenous man Jayden Stafford Bennell was missing for almost four hours before he was found dead in a prison cleaning cupboard, an inquest has heard.. Coronial investigators did not record attempts by Indigenous education staff to locate him before he had died, the inquest in Perth magistrates court was told on Monday.
One day the entire rehab was freaking out about this guy who'd been missing for about five hours.
Just ask Denis Potvin, who once skated for two hours after missing the team bus.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com