Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(18)
The extent of missing data varied from 0%to29%9%, with blood-based measures having the most missing data (see online supplementary table S1).
The amount of missing data varied substantially across different variables.
Rates of missing data varied widely (range: 5.0% to 65.5%).
For the Faroe Islands, the level of missing data varied between 6.7% and 10%.
Follow-up missing data varied from 3% (for BMI) to 20% (for serum GLU levels).
The rate of missing data varied dependent on the specific measure and ranged from 2%-92%-9%
Similar(42)
Note that the number of nucleotide sites with less than 5% of missing data vary both among different loci as well as for a given locus depending on the number of populations considered in each analysis (e.g. population comparisons at the worldwide scale or on subsets of populations defined on a geographic criterion; analyses at the intra-population level).
We will describe the sample by calculating the proportions of responses and non-responses for each variable and for the questionnaire overall and then we will investigate whether patterns of missing data vary according to key sociodemographic characteristics.
aNumbers of missing data varies for different variables.
The proportion of missing data varies over the years, but the proportion of cases with at least some missing data remains fairly constant across years.
The amount of missing data varies substantially between the scores with scores requiring multiple laboratory or clinical values (such as QRISK2) having the lowest levels of completeness.
More suggestions(14)
missing responses varied
missing values varied
missing topics varied
missing data excluded
missing items varied
missing answers varied
missing rates varied
missing questions varied
missing outcomes varied
missing resources varied
missing annotations varied
missing results varied
missing genotypes varied
missing data imbalanced
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com