Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(8)
The majority of the substances with missing criteria were measured in two datasets: CH 1-2 and CH 2-1.
We evaluated diagnostic consequences by baseline characteristics and missing criteria for a definite diagnosis in each headache subtype.
This immediately suggests that the existence of a flexibility window in a hypothetical structure is one of the missing criteria for the selection of good candidates for synthesis.
Second, probable headache could be heterogeneous in terms of missing criteria; however, we could not conduct a more detailed subgroup analysis due to the sample size of our study patients.
Most probable TTH cases (78.9 %) did not satisfy the criteria for number of attacks or total period at baseline, and their diagnostic stability was lower compared with subgroups of other missing criteria.
In terms of missing criteria, the diagnostic stability was relatively lower in the subgroups lacking data on time-based criteria, number of attacks, or total headache period – in migraine and TTH – because the proportion progressing to a definite diagnosis for these subgroups was higher than for other subgroups.
Similar(52)
If any criteria are missing in an alternative, this alternative should be withdrawn from the decision process or given an extremely low symbolic value to the missing criterion.
The number of attacks was the most common missing criterion in both probable migraine and probable TTH.
In probable TTH, the proportion of constant probable diagnosis was lowest in patients with the missing criterion of total headache period.
Omitting studies that did not meet the remaining QA criteria that were commonly missed (Criteria #1, 2, 6) did not change the conclusions of the meta-analysis (data not shown).
It is noteworthy that in this new Taiwanese version of the DS14, in comparison with the existing Chinese and Western versions, the validation base is broadened to cover the previously missed criteria of cognitive and behavioral dimensions of social inhibition.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com