Suggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Missing analyses revealed no significant differences between children included in the data set, and those excluded because of an incomplete BRIEF-P form (n = 38) with regard to any of these variables [ 57].
Similar(59)
Missing data analyses revealed that they were missing completely at random (MCAR), therefore we did not use any imputation method.
Missing values analyses revealed that persons with missing values on mental and/or physical function scales were significantly more likely to be lower educated, have fewer basic and luxury goods and have worse physical and mental function scores at the 2004 baseline.
Sensitivity analyses revealed that missing data had no statistically significant effect on the pattern of results.
Further sensitivity analyses with inclusion of valid non-included trials, performance of missing follow-up, and subgroup analyses revealed consistent and highly significant results in favor of active LLLT for osteoarthritis' [ 8].
Previous analyses revealed that data was missing for this broad aim [ 9], with information on HUWs lacking for people with T2D, pre-diabetes and NGT from one source population.
Analyses revealed that higher-fit children exhibited lower miss rates and smaller P3a amplitude relative to lower-fit children.
Structure analyses revealed that the films obtained comprised mostly α and θ Al2O3 phases and missed a Pt crystalline phase.
Coding sequence analyses revealed that the TaMET1 genes of chromosome 5A and 5D display deletions and premature stop codons and if expressed produce truncated proteins missing the DNA methyltransferase domain.
Thematic analyses revealed eight themes.
Between-group analyses revealed that the collectivistic group exclusively engaged the parahippocampal gyrus (parahippocampal place area) – a region critical to contextual integration – during negative face processing – suggesting compensatory activations when contextual information was missing.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com