missing a lot

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "missing a lot" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to describe something or someone that is not present or is not present in full. For example: "I've been away from home for two weeks, so I'm missing a lot."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Formal & Business

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

57 human-written examples

Álvarez swinging and missing a lot.

The Guardian - Sport

"We're missing a lot of opportunities".

The New York Times - Sports

Those absent diners are missing a lot.

The New York Times

"It's missing a lot of personal touches.

The New York Times

So we are actually missing a lot of this stuff.

Yale University

"Television is missing a lot of people," he said.

The New York Times

"I was hitting the ball short and missing a lot".

The New York Times

Most American bands are missing a lot more".

The New York Times - Arts

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

3 human-written examples

If you are only U.S.-centric, you are missing a lot of opportunities.

MIT Technology Review

That was fairly effective, but I wound up missing a lot.

The New Yorker

"We're missing a lot of guys in camp.

Los Angeles Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "missing a lot", ensure the context clearly indicates what is being missed. Be specific to enhance clarity.

Common error

Avoid using "missing a lot" without specifying what is being missed. For instance, instead of saying "The report is missing a lot", specify "The report is missing a lot of key data".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "missing a lot" functions as a descriptive phrase, indicating a significant absence or deficiency. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's used to convey that something is lacking in a considerable amount.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

37%

Formal & Business

27%

Science

16%

Less common in

Academia

7%

Wiki

6%

Reference

3%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "missing a lot" is a grammatically correct and frequently used expression to indicate a significant absence or deficiency. Ludwig AI confirms its usability in various contexts. While versatile, it's best practice to specify what exactly is being missed to avoid vagueness. Alternatives like "lacking considerably" or "overlooking much" can be used for variety, but "missing a lot" remains a straightforward and widely understood choice.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

lacking considerably

Emphasizes a significant deficiency in something.

overlooking much

Highlights the act of failing to notice or consider important details.

losing out on many

Focuses on the missed opportunities or benefits.

deficient in numerous aspects

Stresses a widespread lack of necessary qualities or components.

absent from various occasions

Highlights a pattern of non-attendance or presence.

omitting a great deal

Emphasizes the act of intentionally or unintentionally leaving something out.

forsaking plenty

Focuses on the act of giving up or abandoning numerous things.

wanting in multiple areas

Highlights a deficiency across different aspects or domains.

skipping a good portion

Emphasizes the act of bypassing or omitting a significant part of something.

overpassing a quantity

Highlights the act of exceeding in numbers of missed portions

FAQs

How can I use "missing a lot" in a sentence?

You can use "missing a lot" to describe deficiencies, absences, or oversights. For example, "The presentation was "lacking detail", missing a lot of crucial information".

What are some alternatives to saying "missing a lot"?

Depending on the context, you can use phrases like "lacking considerably", "overlooking much", or "losing out on many".

Is it grammatically correct to say "missing a lot"?

Yes, "missing a lot" is grammatically correct and commonly used in English to indicate a significant absence or deficiency. It's important to ensure the context is clear.

What's the difference between "missing a lot" and "missing many"?

"Missing a lot" is generally used to describe a substantial quantity of something being absent, while "missing many" emphasizes the number of individual items or instances that are absent. You can use "missing many" in places where you would specify number of things you are missing.