This kind of sensationalised misreading is familiar journalistic practice - but laziness in reading of this type is something noticeably lacking from the pages of the LRB.
This misreading is possibly caused by the larger amplitude of the later peak compared to the true peak in the correlogram (shown in Fig. 1e, f, h, j).
Furthermore, specific effects on misreading were observed for mutants of ribosomal components and key factors involved in elongation and termination.
Kramer and Farabaugh also noted that misreading was enhanced in the presence of paromomycin for codons where there was potential for UU base-pairing [3].
Ewing's apparent misread was the first mistake.
But what we misread was how profound would be the ensuing disillusionment.
EP misreads were beyond the scope of this methodology, but also merit study.
The type of scan most commonly misread was a contrast-enhanced CT of the abdomen and pelvis [10].
The emergency physician was directed to enter the discrepancy into the study (by recording the EP name, date and patient identifiers in a study binder) if they felt that the misread was clinically significant.
After his treatment, he told me that the one thing he totally misread was the sheer ferocity of the side effects, especially lethargy.
Too often the complicated is misread as being ill thought-through.
