Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

misleading to

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "misleading to" is not correct in standard written English.
It is typically used incorrectly; the correct form would be "misleading" followed by a noun or clause, rather than "to." Example: "The advertisement was misleading, leading consumers to believe they would receive more than they actually did."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Formal & Business

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

57 human-written examples

It's misleading to tourists," she said.

News & Media

Independent

"It's misleading to the public".

News & Media

The New York Times

It would plainly be misleading to call it total.

News & Media

The Economist

It is misleading to speak without qualification of Mill's Utilitarianism.

It is misleading to place so much hope in them.

News & Media

The Economist

Cormann denied it was misleading to include the aid figure.

News & Media

The Guardian

They have no merit and are misleading to readers.

The term junior doctor is misleading to say the least.

News & Media

The Guardian

At the same time, it's misleading to say there is a single China policy.

News & Media

The New York Times

Me: Don't you think it's misleading to lump credit card balances in with small-business loans?

News & Media

The New York Times

It is, therefore, misleading to present Heidegger's philosophy as a set of clearly understandable results.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

While commonly used, consider using the grammatically correct form, simply "misleading", followed by a noun or clause, for example: "The data was misleading". Alternatively, use "deceptive towards" or "misleading regarding".

Common error

The phrase "misleading to" incorrectly uses the preposition "to" after the adjective "misleading". Avoid this structure; instead, use "misleading" followed by the subject it affects or use alternative prepositions like "regarding" or "towards".

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

2.8/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "misleading to" functions as an adjective describing something that causes someone to have an incorrect understanding or belief. However, Ludwig AI suggests this usage is incorrect, the examples show its frequent use nonetheless.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

45%

Science

35%

Encyclopedias

6%

Less common in

Formal & Business

6%

Wiki

2%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "misleading to" is frequently used across various contexts, including News & Media and Science, Ludwig AI flags it as grammatically incorrect. The intended meaning is to describe something that causes a false impression. For better clarity and grammatical correctness, consider using "misleading" followed by a noun or clause, or rephrasing with prepositions like "regarding" or "towards". Common alternatives include "deceptive towards" and "misleading regarding". Despite its common usage, aiming for grammatical accuracy will enhance the clarity and professionalism of your writing.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "misleading to" to be grammatically correct?

Instead of "misleading to", you can use "misleading" followed by a noun or clause (e.g., "The advertisement was misleading"). Alternatively, consider using "deceptive towards" or "misleading regarding" depending on the context.

What are some alternatives to "misleading to" that still convey the same meaning?

Some alternatives include "deceptive towards", "misleading regarding", "likely to mislead", or "liable to deceive". The best choice depends on the specific context and nuance you want to convey.

Is it always incorrect to use the phrase "misleading to"?

While commonly used, the phrase "misleading to" doesn't conform to standard grammatical rules. It's generally better to use alternatives like "misleading" followed by a noun or clause, or rephrase with prepositions like "regarding" or "towards" for better clarity and correctness.

What makes "misleading to" grammatically questionable?

The adjective "misleading" typically describes something directly without needing the preposition "to". Using "to" in this context is often seen as redundant or awkward. Hence, it's usually more effective and grammatically sound to use "misleading" directly or rephrase the sentence.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

2.8/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: