Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
While the majority of Republicans who spoke applauded the plan, Democrats called it "disgraceful," "misleading," and "unethical," aggressively questioning its legality and justification.
Comparisons with discussions of justification in modern epistemology may therefore be misleading.
So it seems that any justification \(A(D \) lends to belief in \(D\) must be preceded by some justification for believing that appearances are not misleading, i.e., \(\neg (A(D) \wedge \neg D \).
Instead, the Chairman's statement repeats the well-worn justifications for his proposal, which range from questionable to misleading to outright wrong.
Here the core idea is that your experience gives you justification unless you have gained evidence that your experience is misleading.
Although there is certainly ample justification for giving special emphasis to these authors, it would misleading if one thought one could get even a fair overall picture from them alone.
And misleading.
How misleading.
This is misleading.
That was misleading information.
This is highly misleading.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com