Exact(1)
Furthermore, when asked to evaluate an assertion in a situation of blameless mistake, where the speaker had every reason to expect the evidence not to be misleading (Experiment 5), the outcome was also not straightforward.
Similar(58)
Textbooks, he adds, are systematically misleading about the experiment.
Fig. 3 Comparison of misleading detail recall between Experiment 1 and Experiment 2 (means and standard errors plotted).
So, what are the major problems with many animal experiments to date? "…critics have argued that animal experiments are misleading or even of no value.
Indeed, there are many examples of animal experiments that have preceded unsuccessful clinical trials, such that critics have argued that animal experiments are misleading or even of no value.
The alternative view is that animal experiments are informative in the majority of cases but only if we conduct them appropriately and analyse them critically with care" "…critics have argued that animal experiments are misleading or even of no value.
Although this conclusion is correct, as an explanation for the results of the bell-in-vacuum experiment it is misleading.
If the investigator constructs a loose protocol and allows the experimenters to vary how they conduct the experimental procedures or interviews with different subjects, it is likely that the results of the experiment will be misleading.
Analysis of data from size-selectivity experiments will be misleading if this between-deployment variability is not taken into consideration.
Yet comparison of different micropollutant removal experiments might be misleading in regard to different specific activities of the laccases and thereby quite different amounts of applied enzyme as e.g. Mrl2 has an exceptionally high specific activity towards ABTS.
Because structure data are often represented as torsion angles and PCA is not originally designed to deal with this kind of circular data, the outcome of PCA experiments can be misleading.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com