Sentence examples for misleading evaluation from inspiring English sources

Moreover, the error covariance matrix gives a misleading evaluation of tracking filter performance, as mentioned earlier in this subsection.

On the other hand, the Levenshtein distance does not consider the time alignment of the two sequences, and may result in misleading evaluation in the case that two phonetic subsequences that are not co-occurring in time are aligned by mistake.

Huttenhower et al. have concluded that the effect of missing annotations can produce misleading evaluation results because the classifiers are differentially impacted.

However, despite the fact that the main generator was found, both sLORETA and dSPM presented also spurious sources in the deeper regions of both hemispheres (including posterior cingulate gyrus and thalamus), resulting in misleading evaluation (i.e., high SD values and low AUC values).

Neglecting the role that these types of failures play may result in significantly misleading MTBF evaluation models which in turn lead to incorrect MTBF value.

The manufacturers' upper reference limit (URL) for TgAb, set up to identify patients with AITD but misleading for evaluation of TgAb interference in Tg assay, is another aspect to consider.

First of all, like in our case, the incidental visualization of the fragment at imaging obtained for different purposes might mislead the evaluation of conditions regarding the same anatomical district.

Furthermore, poor methodology in an EE study results in misleading ethical analyses, evaluations or recommendations.

Our analysis of existing approaches shows that they are inconsistent and contain substantial functional biases that render the resulting evaluations misleading both quantitatively and qualitatively.

The lack of standards for assessing and safeguarding quality is not only a problem for scientific quality per se, but also an ethical problem: poor methodology in EE may give rise to misleading ethical analyses, evaluations or recommendationsc, not only depriving the study of scientific and social value, but also risking ethical misjudgement.

Many problems—such as inadequate total dose to the pelvic field and concomitant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT could underlie this lack of clear answers, and may mislead the response evaluation.