Suggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Misclassification of fat intakes due to measurement error in the food frequency questionnaire is unavoidable, but given the study design likely to be nondifferential, and thus attenuating any true association.
Similar(59)
Limitations are that we cannot exclude some misclassification of dietary fat intake due to the fact that dietary intake was self-reported.
However, because BMI does not distinguish visceral from subcutaneous fat, some misclassification of adiposity may have occurred, thereby possibly causing some uncertainty in regard to the relative influence of serum 25(OH)D3 and adiposity in diabetes development.
It is thus possible that we have misclassified the amount of fat among women with dense breasts, and we could therefore have some misclassification of the stratification variable.
Interestingly, the gender difference in CVD mortality appears to somewhat diminish in obese individuals, although misclassification bias between obese and non-obese individuals might occur due to the gender difference of fat distribution, probably enhanced by disturbances of glucose metabolism.
The use of self-reported dietary questionnaires potentially resulted in the underreporting of fat intake [ 42], but the use of energy-adjusted methods minimizes such potential misclassification [ 32].
Finally, an improvement of FAT is proposed.
One serving of fat.
But beware of fat fees.
Maximal point of fat oxidation.
Type of fat.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com