Sentence examples for misclassification does not from inspiring English sources

This type of misclassification does not allow to split some clusters, which will result aggregated.

As a corollary of this result, we show that correcting for misclassification does not necessarily lead to a widening of the confidence intervals, but, rather, in addition to producing a consistent estimate, can also produce one that is more efficient.

However, disease misclassification does not explain the observed inverse association with propionate use.

This misclassification does not arise with continuously distributed traits because there is no cutoff or case criteria.

However, given that the majority of the deaths were cancer-specific and that we also present patterns of all-cause and other-cause deaths, a minor degree of such misclassification does not threaten our main conclusions.

However, the use of multi-angle data minimizes the impact of biome misidentification on LAI retrievals; that is, with a probability of about 70%, uncertainties in LAI retrievals due to biome misclassification do not exceed uncertainties in the observations.

Epidemiologic studies have been commanded to demonstrate that such misclassification did not occur (e.g., via biological markers of smoking).

In a sensitivity analysis restricted to these cases (i.e., those with supporting clinical codes) and their matched controls, we found no material differences in the results, adding confidence that case misclassification did not materially impact our results.

Although non-Berkson error may have been introduced in the exposure assessment if people changed their place of residence, associations based on cohort members who did not relocate during the 5 years before 2000 were similar to estimates for the cohort as whole, suggesting that exposure misclassification did not substantially bias our findings.

These ratios suggest that the AHS nonswine-exposed participants acquired infection either through indirect exposure to swine (e.g., handling dirty laundry or exposure to other fomites), misclassification (did not report direct contact with swine but did occasionally enter a swine barn), or exposure to their spouses who were shedding swine influenza viruses.

However, other studies which used neighbourhood characteristics as surrogates of social support, whereas we used individual level data that allowed us to have more detailed information, and smoking was significantly associated to LBW; therefore we believe that misclassification did not particularly affect our results.