Suggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Variables found not to confound the associations of interest included the following: age at menarche, parity, lactation, months of lactation, age at first birth, number of miscarriages, history of fertility problems, alcohol drinking, race, education, religion, and marital status.
Similar(59)
The variable "pregnancies" indicated that 22.30% of participants had a miscarriage or abortion history, with an average of two (1.3 SD); five women had more than three previous miscarriages.
The study purpose was to examine the influences of miscarriage history and prepregnancy weight status on pregnant women's psychological health, exercise motivation, and behavior using the Theory of Planned Behavior.
The aim of this study was to investigate factors associated with thrombosis that may contribute to recurrent pregnancy loss (habitual abortion), specifically differences in serum levels of platelet-activating factor and thrombin-activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor (carboxypeptidase B2) between women with a history of recurrent miscarriage and those with no recurrent miscarriage history.
The factors which interacted with sex to affect CTEV risk were: maternal gravidity and miscarriage history, chorionic villus sampling in the index pregnancy, forceps delivery, birthweight, and proband birth year.
The characteristics of women in our sample by miscarriage history are shown in Table 1.
This pattern of change over time in bonding scores did not differ by miscarriage history.
First, Student's t-tests were used to compare variables by miscarriage history.
Women did not differ by miscarriage history on any other characteristics.
Likewise, when multiple linear regression analysis was completed, adjusting for variables that are theoretically related to miscarriage history and/or maternal-infant bonding, there was no statistically significant relationship between miscarriage history and maternal-infant bonding scores (all p > 0.05).
To our knowledge, this is the first cohort study to link miscarriage history with brain tumour risk in the offspring.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com