Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Another chunk would go to surrogate mothers, who would charge about 50% more than usual because of risks to their health: Miscarriage is more likely and the infant might be overly large.
Similar(59)
"But as it turns out ― for me, anyway ― miscarriage was more of a 'this straight-up f**king sucks' situation.
Data regarding miscarriage are more polarized with percentages of 70% before 1990 and <40% in the following years [ 5].
Women who had a history of miscarriage were more likely to be Exercisers very early in pregnancy.
Women who had a history of miscarriage were more likely to have a child with a brain tumour (OR=1.68; 95% CI: 1.16 2.42).
Time to pregnancy data has shown to be valid even where there is a recall of 20 years, although non-birth outcomes such as miscarriage are more commonly excluded [ 40, 43- 45].
Recent evidence suggests that the determinants of the association may aggregate in families, as women with a history of recurrent miscarriage were more likely to have parents who experience CHD.
However, in both univariable and multivariable models, women who reported a previous miscarriage were more likely to have reported IPV in the recent pregnancy (aOR 1.76; 95% CI 1.20, 2.58).
Compared with IPIs of 6 12 months, pregnancies that were conceived ≤3 months after a miscarriage were more likely to result in a live birth and less likely to result in a miscarriage (adjusted relative risk ratio (RRR) 0.70, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.86) or induced abortion (0.50, 0.29 to 0.89).
Pregnancies after a miscarriage or stillbirth are more likely to result in a subsequent miscarriage or stillbirth, respectively, and this tends to occur irrespective of the interval between the pregnancies.
Women with a history of miscarriage and stillbirth were more likely to be infected by syphilis (OR 2.22, 95% CI 0.54-9.60) and (OR 3.24, 95% CI 0.00-17.54), respectively.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com