Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(12)
Segments of 10 minutes and 20 minutes were compared and found to yield the same reliability and integrity results.
Design: The distances walked in 2 minutes were compared with the results on the physical functioning subscale of the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36) and the Houghton Scale.
Data that were extrapolated from neonates with low Apgar scores at 5 minutes were compared with neonates with Apgar scores of ≥7 with the use of the Fisher exact test, χ2 test, or one-way analysis of variance; a two-tailed probability value of <.05 was considered significant.
Patients achieving first door-to-device time ≤ 120 minutes were compared with patients with delayed treatment; independent predictors of timely treatment were determined using generalized estimating equations logistic regression models.
Values (counts per 10 minutes) were compared using the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed ranks test.
Axial bSSFP images (FOV 3×3 cm, 14 minutes) were compared with the more traditionally-used spin echo (SE) images acquired with the following parameters: axial orientation, FOV 3×3 cm, TR/TE = 600/25 ms (T1w), 2000/70 ms (T2w), 1 mm slice thickness, 128×128 matrix, 234 µm in-plane resolution, and acquisition time of 20 (T1w) or 17 (T2w) minutes.
Similar(48)
The effectiveness of MAHMA NONOate (which has half-life of minutes) was compared to that of sperimne NONOate, which has half-life of several hours.
The slope of absorbance over 10 minutes was compared between samples with and without ouabain to give a value for activity of only Na+/K+ ATPase.
The simulation results of the glycoform distribution after 40 minutes are compared between the base case GalT enzyme concentration with that of a 10-fold increase in GalT concentration (Fig. 8A,B).
The proportion of patients in each arm achieving the target BP within 30 minutes was compared with chi-square analysis.
Total activity time obtained from the Whistle device in minutes was compared to the total activity count from the Actical device.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com