Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
This means that it is sufficient to consider the atomic arrangement only in of the unit cell, which is the minimum repeating unit of the [11 0] projection, to fully describe the crystal structure when viewed along the [11 0] direction.
Similar(59)
The minimum repeat unit was defined as 12, 6, 4, 3, 3 and 3, respectively, for the mono- to hexanucleotide.
Microsatellites were defined considering the minimum repeat unit as six for di- and five for tri-, tetra-, penta-, and hexanucleotides.
The minimum repeat unit length was set to 2 and the maximum repeat unit length to 4. The minimum microsatellite length was set to 24.
The eTandem algorithm was run with a minimum repeat unit of 2 bp and a maximum repeat unit of 100 bp, as previously described [ 26].
The parameter settings were as follows: the minimum repeat unit was defined as seven repeats for dinucleotide motifs, five repeats for tri-motifs, four repeats for tetra-motifs, and three repeats for penta-, hepta-,hepta-, and octa-motifs.
The minimum repeat unit was prescribed as follows: 10 repeats for mononucleotides, 6 for di-nucleotides and 5 for all the other motifs such as tri-, tetra-, penta- and hexa-nucleotides.
Di- to hexa-nucleotide SSRs with a minimum repeat unit size of five (for tri- to hexa-nucleotide) or six (for di-nucleotide) were identified based on the analysis of assembled isotig templates.
The size of motifs was two to six nucleotides, and the minimum repeat unit was defined as six for di-nucleotides and four for tri-, tetra-, penta-, and hexa-nucleotides.
To facilitate SSR detection, only 1- to 6-nucleotide motifs were considered, and the minimum repeat unit was defined as 10 for mono-, 6 for di-, and 5 for tri-, tetra-, penta-, and hexa-nucleotides.
The size of motifs was one to six nucleotides, and the minimum repeat unit was defined as 10 for mononucleotides, five for dinucleotides, and four for tri-, tetra-, penta-, and hexa-nucleotides.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com