Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(6)
Fisher Exact test was used to compare the investigator-confirmed best response, independent t-test was used to compare the minimum percentage change of target lesion, and Kaplan Meier analysis and log rank test were used to compare PFS.
Table 2 Minimum percentage capacitance change needed to identify water presence according to the planar model Electrode to casing distance/ mm Minimum percentage change in capacitance 11 6 8 9 4 26.
Table 4 Minimum percentage capacitance change needed to identify water presence according to the circular model Electrode to casing distance/mm Minimum percentage change in capacitance 11 6 8 9 4 25.
The least significant change (LSC) was calculated as the precision × √2, which sets the minimum percentage change between successive measurements that can be considered not due to random error and therefore representing a real change in PETCO2 [28].
For Arclight, because increases in voltage are represented as decreases in fluorescence, maximum fluorescence change values were determined as the minimum percentage change.
The least significant change (LSC) was calculated as the precision × √2, which sets the minimum percentage change between successive measurements that can be considered not due to random error and therefore representing a real change in PETCO2 [ 28].
Similar(54)
The minimum percentage changes in capacitance needed to distinguish between oil and water are given in Table 4.
In Figure 15 we may see the impact in the percentage of executions when combining the QoD of steps C and E (i.e., minimum percentage of changes in zones and detectors).
According to the equation for calculating the least significant change, the minimum percentage of LVSV change detected by EV in this study was 11.3% (sampling interval of three heart beats).
It takes more time (or waves) to converge as we increase the minimum percentage of detectors detecting changes.
We then consider how the results would change if the minimum percentage impact consistent with self-financing was larger than five percent, as it might well be.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com