Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(6)
Addresses were matched using a spelling sensitivity of 70 and a minimum match score of 65.
Geocoding parameters were set as follows: spelling sensitivity of 80, minimum match score of 80, no ties allowed.
A spelling sensitivity score of 80 with a minimum match score of 60 was used during geocoding for TIGER, StreetMap and parcel matching.
Residences within the study area were successfully geocoded: 76% automatically matched using ArcGIS settings of spelling sensitivity equal to 75, minimum candidate score equal to 10, and a minimum match score equal to 60.
The program used the EMBOSS wordfinder tool [ 54] to find adapter fragments (parameters: minimum match score = 70, alignment width = 6, gap opening 0.0 + gap extension 10 or gap opening 500 + gap extension 10).
We geocoded the schools using a 1 5,000 street centerline network from Orange County for 2005 (Orange County Growth Management 2005) and the TIGER 2000 streets from the U.S. Census Bureau (2000), both using ArcGIS 9. Identical settings were employed, including address locator style, field types used in the address locator, minimum match score, and spelling sensitivity.
Similar(54)
The following parameters are used for analysis: gap penalty: 12, minimum score threshold: 10, match score: 3, mismatch score: −4, and maximum extent of repeats: 500 bp.
Cross-match was then used to mask vector sequence in each read (minimum match of 10, minimum score of 20).
The remaining high quality EST set was reduced to a non-redundant set of unique gene transcripts by clustering with phrap [ 66] using the following parameters: mismatch penalty = -5; minimum match = 50; minimum score = 100.
The extent of redundancy for each library was ascertained using the Phrap software (Phil Green, http://www.phrap.org), which was also used to compile the unisequence set (minimum match of 50, minimum score of 100).
Assemblies were performed with a minimum percent identity score of 98, a minimum overlap length of 500 nt, a match score of 1, a mismatch penalty of -2, a gap penalty of -2, and an additional first gap penalty of -3.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com