Suggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Previous studies, such as [10] and [12], only address the interface between films and Cu or SUS substrate with a minimum interface roughness of 50 to 100 nm.
Similar(59)
On the other hand, the BaTiO3 films on SUS substrates had a lower critical minimum thickness of 0.2 μm, a lower interface roughness, and a fewer macroscopic defects than the BaTiO3 films on Cu substrates.
An interface roughness of less than 50 nm and a minimum surface roughness of 14.3 nm were obtained after RTA treatment at 650°C.
As a result, the BaTiO3 films on SUS substrates had a lower critical minimum thickness of 0.2 μm, a fewer macroscopic defects, and a lower interface roughness than the BaTiO3 films on Cu substrates.
interface roughness.
In this case, hole mobility suffers from interface roughness.
This trend confirms that the interface roughness becomes worse.
Interface roughness is randomly generated using an exponential autocorrelation function.
TEM results revealed that the interface roughness increases with N, but thermal annealing makes interface smoother[19, 20].
The slope of the fitting line is related to the interface roughness δ.
The interface roughness of YBCO/LCMO, as well as the surface roughness of all layers was obtained.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com