Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(6)
Taking into account theses data, minimum expected number of participants for the reference panel was 20.
Minimum expected number of participants is 150 for urologists, 100 for residents and 50 for medical students.
Minimum expected number of participants is 150 for the Board certified Urologists, 100 for the residents and 50 for medical students.
The numbers found (triangles in Fig. 5) are thus the maximum expected number of consistent observations and the minimum expected number of inconsistent observations if the data would have been completely consistent, given the overlapping distributions.
Therefore, the minimum expected number of observations in 1 week is given by: Secondly, to obtain an overall indication of the level of usability of the system, all new system users (including doctors, nurses, allied healthcare professionals and students) were asked to complete a feedback form approximately 2 weeks after SEND had gone live in the clinical area.
Then a sample contains heterozygous individual when: 3 or 4 where (n 2 - n E ) is the corrected number of nucleotides, which should be higher than the minimum expected number of nucleotides given the minimum ratio of an allele in the mixture (1/6 or 1/4), n and 0.01 in Equations 3 and 4 means that the chance of a value equal to or less than the expected value is no more than 0.01.
Similar(53)
In order to provide a robust statistical analysis in a faster period of time, minimum expected numbers of participants were 100 for the board certified urologists, 80 for the total of chief-residents and residents and 50 for the medical students.
Carling (2000) showed that, for several probability distributions and various sample sizes, approximately 5%to50%50 % of the total number of observations N can be, in general, set as the minimum and maximum reasonably expected number of potential outliers, respectively.
We have found a minimum of 3,820 sequences coding for TFs in data currently available, i.e. almost 40% of the expected number.
That is nearly double the expected number.
Expected number of failures.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com