Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(15)
The Pearson chi-square test or Fisher's exact test (if the minimum expected count will be less than 2 or the ratio of expected counts lower than 5 will be more than 20%) will be used to compare the proportions of subjects reporting symptoms related to ILI and adverse events.
The minimum expected count is.06.06
The minimum expected count is.03 cellsells (95.2 %) have expected count less than 5.
The minimum expected count is.02 e7 cells (87.5 %) have expected count less than 5.
The minimum expected count is 28.42 bComputed only for a 2 × 2 table.
The minimum expected count is 10.0 Table 4 Interrater Cohen's k scores.
Similar(45)
aOptimal according to the adopted metric, i.e., minimum hop count or minimum Expected Transmission Count (ETX .bBetter RREQ according to the adopted metric (i.e., hop count).
Vector bands were removed and the fingerprints further screened to require at least half of the minimum expected band count for the size range of the clone library (using a conversion factor 1 band = 1.2 kb).
The observed mismatch distribution was tested against expected values in a stable population (i.e. population with constant population size; following [58]), and in a growing or declining population (following [59], equation 4), with χ2-tests (pooling classes to achieve a minimum of 5 expected counts in each class).
a. 1 cells (12.5%) have expected count less than 5.
In large-scale networks, where pmf ground truth is not available, we compare the expected count with true target counts.
More suggestions(15)
minimum expected energy
minimum expected failure
minimum expected life
minimum expected frequency
minimum expected meeting
minimum expected pair
minimum expected length
minimum expected wavelength
minimum expected difference
minimum expected delay
minimum expected misclassification
minimum expected temperature
minimum expected cost
minimum expected error
minimum expected utility
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com