Sentence examples for minimum evolution maximum from inspiring English sources

It has been previously explored that MrBayes3.1 with appropriate constraints, produced trees with higher confidence at each node than other tree methods: neighbor-joining, minimum evolution, maximum parsimony, and the un-weighted pair group method with arithmetic mean [61].

Phylogenetic analyses were performed using minimum evolution, maximum parsimony and maximum likelihood methods.

Robustness for the nodes in the minimum evolution, maximum parsimony, and maximum likelihood trees was evaluated using the bootstrap.

Phylogenetic trees were constructed in PAUP 4.0b10 [ 25], using minimum evolution, maximum likelihood, and maximum parsimony methods.

Analyses involved producing a phylogenetic tree of viral gene sequences based upon the following approaches: minimum evolution, maximum parsimony, and maximum likelihood in PAUP (27 ).

The phylogenetic analysis using different methods (Minimum Evolution, Maximum, Neighbor-Joining and UPGMA, with or without an out group - PGRP-S1) show the same structure (data not shown).

BI: Bayesian inference; ME: minimum evolution; ML: maximum likelihood; MP: maximum-parsimony; mt: mitochondrial.

Phylogenetic analyses using minimum evolution (ME), maximum parsimony (MP), and maximum likelihood (ML) were performed in PAUP∗4b10 [ 43].

The aligned amino acid sequences were concatenated into a single data set, which was subjected to maximum-parsimony (MP), minimum evolution (ME), maximum likelihood (ML), and Bayesian inference (BI) methods of phylogenetic reconstruction.

Phylogenetic trees were constructed for cyt b and COI sequence alignments using the Maximum Parsimony, Neighbor-Joining, Minimum Evolution and Maximum Likelihood methods.

Full phylogenetic trees for Maximum Parsimony, Neighbor-Joining, Minimum Evolution and Maximum Likelihood methods for the COI and cyt b genes can be found in the Figures S1 S11 and Tables S3 and S4.