Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
minimum errors for
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "minimum errors for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the goal of achieving the least amount of mistakes or inaccuracies in a particular context, such as a project or process. Example: "Our objective is to ensure minimum errors for the final report to maintain high standards of quality."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
Alternative expressions(1)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
5 human-written examples
The maximum and minimum errors for all activity concentrations are depicted in Fig. 4.
Science
The maximum count rate error around the peak NECR and the maximum and minimum errors for all activity concentrations are reported.
Science
The number of tapers giving the minimum errors for the sinusoidal tapers, Thomson multitapers and Welch method and the errors of the single Hamming window are also shown.
Threshold values of rrCBF = 1.4 and 1.6 provided minimum errors for determining a glioblastoma from a grade 3 or 2 glioma.
Science
The minimum error was obtained from all of the clusters predicted for each gene cluster, and the average of the minimum errors for the 10 gene clusters from A. flavus and A. fumigatus described above was then calculated at each value for the parameters.
Science
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
55 human-written examples
Maximum modulus count rate error at peak NECR as well as maximum and minimum error for all activity concentrations are reported.
Science
For all three bandlimited white noise processes and for all sets of windows, the optimization converged to the same minimum error for all the 100 cases, based on equal sets of weighting factors.
Regarding to accuracy indexes, specificity and sensitivity, the system had the minimum error for a mixed sample (60% olive oil-40oil-40%a oil), specificity and sensitivity were obtained as 98% and 100%, respectively and accuracy was obtained as 72%, which was the weakest value.
The minimum error for each permutation across the top 2 to 10 ranked genes was used to calculate the p values for both of the above types of permutation to avoid bias.
Science
The solution results correspond to the absolute minimum error for each sample for all mixing fractions and parameter sets tested by the ternary model, although a number of models with slightly different mixing fractions and ages of water were identified that could be consistent with measured tracer concentrations in the ASW samples and samples from the monitoring wells in the area.
Science
The minimum error of classification for each of the subsets (8%13%%) was lower than that for the superset of all samples (28%), suggesting that homogeneity of tumour content rather than tumour content per se might be an important factor for response prediction.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When aiming for "minimum errors for" any process, establish clear guidelines and quality control checks at each stage.
Common error
Don't assume that aiming for "minimum errors for" each individual step guarantees minimal overall error. Error propagation can compound small errors into significant deviations. Consider error accumulation across all stages.
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "minimum errors for" functions as a prepositional phrase, often used to specify a goal or objective related to minimizing mistakes in a particular context. Ludwig examples show its application in scientific and research domains.
Frequent in
Science
100%
Less common in
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Academia
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "minimum errors for" is grammatically correct and commonly used to indicate an objective of achieving the fewest possible mistakes in a given scenario. Ludwig AI confirms its usability and appropriateness, particularly in scientific and formal contexts. Alternative phrases like "least errors possible for" or "fewest errors for" can provide stylistic variation. When employing this phrase, ensure that quality control measures are well-defined and applied consistently to mitigate error propagation and ensure the best possible results. While striving for minimal errors is crucial, recognizing the potential for some errors and planning for their management is equally important.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
least errors possible for
Changes the wording to emphasize the desire for the fewest errors.
minimum mistakes for
Substitutes "errors" with the synonym "mistakes".
fewest errors for
Replaces "minimum" with "fewest" to indicate the smallest quantity of errors.
smallest error margin for
Rephrases to focus on the acceptable error margin.
lowest error rate for
Shifts the focus to the rate of errors instead of the absolute number.
reduced errors for
Highlights the act of diminishing the errors.
optimized for error reduction
Focuses on optimizing a process to reduce errors.
accuracy maximization for
Reverses the perspective to prioritize maximizing accuracy.
error minimization in
Uses a different preposition and emphasizes the process of reducing errors within a system.
targeting minimal errors
Rephrases to describe the act of targeting a small amount of mistakes.
FAQs
How can I ensure "minimum errors for" a research paper?
To ensure "minimum errors for" a research paper, meticulously proofread your work, seek feedback from peers, and utilize grammar and spell-checking tools. Consider enlisting a professional editor for a final review.
What's the difference between aiming for "minimum errors for" and aiming for perfection?
Aiming for "minimum errors for" acknowledges that some errors may inevitably occur and prioritizes reducing them to an acceptable level. Aiming for perfection implies a pursuit of error-free work, which may be unrealistic or inefficient. Strategies like "accuracy maximization for" and other similar terms can be used depending on the context.
What are some strategies for achieving "minimum errors for" a software project?
Strategies for achieving "minimum errors for" a software project include thorough testing, code reviews, continuous integration, and adhering to coding standards. Also, it can be useful to implement robust error handling and logging mechanisms.
In statistical analysis, what does aiming for "minimum errors for" predictions mean?
In statistical analysis, aiming for "minimum errors for" predictions involves selecting models and parameters that minimize the difference between predicted and actual values. This may involve using techniques such as cross-validation and regularization. Or using the "smallest error margin for" is also another solution.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested