Sentence examples for minimum effective size from inspiring English sources

Figure 3 shows the minimum effective size Nemin required for selection to overcome genetic drift for mutations corresponding to a range of altered means (Figure 3A) and variances (Figure 3B) of the cumulative risk Fbo(x) estimated for BRCA1 alleles in the case of the population of Quebec (red line in Figure 3A and 3C).

Convergence was verified using Tracer 1.4 [ 68] and accepted when the effective sample size of all the parameters was larger than 100, the recommended minimum effective size [ 68].

Convergence was assessed using the criteria of 1) a maximum bipartition discrepancy (maxdiff) < 0.1 and 2) a minimum effective size > 100 for all sampled parameters.

Two independent Monte Carlo Markov chains were run for each dataset, and chain convergence was estimated checking the values of maximum discrepancy across bipartitions (<0.1) and minimum effective size of the summary variables listed in the 'trace' output (>100).

Finally, Bayesian trees were inferred with PhyloBAYES v3.2 [ 57] using CAT, 2 independent Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) chains, a saving frequency of 100 generations, and the following stop criteria, as recommended in the manual: 1) a maximum bipartition discrepancy (maxdiff) < 0.1 and 2) a minimum effective size > 100 for all parameters.

Most human populations will generally have higher effective population sizes than these minimum effective sizes [20].

For a population of changing size, the relevant effective population size is close to the minimum (effective) population size over the time period of interest (Wright 1931).

While it should yield adequate approximation of the effective SNP size for practical use, there is no guarantee on finding the absolute minimum effective SNP size.

The results, she says, really come into play in the minimum effective population size calculations used by conservationists to manage threatened and endangered species.

However, we projected that such resource restrictions would still allow for sufficient enrollment to yield a minimum effective sample size that would be sufficient for primary outcome analyses, even after factoring in an anticipated drop-out rate of 10% per group (see sample size justification below) [4,5,37].

The minimum effective sample size targeted for this study was 10 patients in each of the three groups, which would allow for 80% power to detect a clinically large size mean differences (i.e. 50% or 250 min per week of physical activity) between the music and no music treatment groups, assuming a two-tailed alpha of 0.05.