Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Developers defined a minimum correct response, as well as a maximum correct response, for each highlighting item.
Similar(59)
Therefore, minimum "corrected" depth was below zero (−4.11 m), so cannot be used for further diving behaviour analyses.
The specimens are divided into eight ESUs, which were grouped into two clades: Part A (H1 6) and part B (H7 8) specimens were separated by high divergence values in the COI and 28S fragments (minimum corrected p-distance of 14.5% and 1.9% respectively) and showed consistent morphological differences (spined large styles in Part A specimens vs. smooth large styles in Part B specimens).
All values were above the minimum corrected item-total correlation of 0.20, which has been recommended for the inclusion of an item in a scale [ 33].
Minimum corrected and uncorrected pairwise (mitochondrial) genetic divergences between candidate species (>22.1/15.3%) were much higher than maximum distances within candidate species (<11.6/9.7%) (see Table 2 and Additional file 1, Table S2, respectively), further emphasising their long periods of historical isolation.
Three criteria were used in the process of deciding which items to retain: 1) a minimum interitem correlation of 0.20 and a maximum of 0.70, 2) a minimum corrected item total correlation coefficient of 0.30, and 3) a minimum Cronbach's reliability of 0.70.
"You would abolish the minimum wage?" "Correct".
With this analysis, no shRNA with FDR corrected p-value below 0.05 could be found, and the minimum FDR corrected p-value was 0.184.
Maximum intraclade (whenever more than one haplotype was found) and minimum interclade/branch corrected p-distances were calculated for the COI and the 28S gene fragment using PAUP* 4.0b10 [34] under the respective models from the ML analyses.
The minimum Bonferroni corrected P value for trend testing ABCB11 was 5.81×10−4 (rs3815676) and for ABCB4 it was 4.6×10−7(rs2109505).
Moreover, the use of the minimum and corrected P-values did not identify a significant cut-off.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com